You may be hearing the term “Clinical Process Improvement” (CPI) more frequently in conversations about controlling waste in healthcare. Across the industry, there is growing interest in the role of CPI solutions to unlock the value embedded in clinical data and improve workflows, processes and quality of care. But the definition is still evolving and what was once a ‘quiet crisis,’ is finally getting some of the attention it deserves. One catalyst for all this talk about CPI is its designation as a new category by healthcare advisory firm KLAS. In April 2018, KLAS released its report titled “Clinical Process Improvement 2018: Paving the Way for Improved Clinical Processes.”
In my two most recent blog posts, ‘Why process improvement, technology and common sense are critical to patient safety’ and ‘Pairing process improvement and technology to increase clinician satisfaction,’ I shared several articles illustrating the essential interplay between clinical process improvement and technology. Today’s post follows the same model to examine approaches for reducing waste in healthcare.
New models of care depend on adopting strategies for transforming clinical practice to improve quality, reduce costs, and meet the needs of patients and families. With actionable insights into their processes, clinicians are empowered to suggest and help implement effective changes like standardizing clinical content to deliver highly reliable health care. Monitoring and measuring how clinical processes are adopted and their impact on outcomes are essential to high-impact care redesign.
At #HIMSS18, clinical leaders came together to discuss the strategies they've implemented, or are implementing, to drive appropriate utilization, higher levels of clinician satisfaction, and improve patient safety and quality. Click the button below to download the dialogue.
In my recent blog post, ‘Why process improvement, technology and common sense are critical to patient safety,’ I shared three articles illustrating how process, technology and critical thinking all have a role in ensuring quality of care. Today’s post follows the same model to examine how process improvement and technology work together to impact clinician satisfaction.
Patient safety is the number one concern of any healthcare provider, yet the tools put in place to help guide clinicians in providing appropriate care are often hindering it. Whether it’s out-of-date or confusing workflows documented in electronic health record (EHR) systems or difficulty in using the systems themselves, the technology does not always contribute to better patient care. Process improvement and common sense must be applied to ensure quality of care.
I’ve read several articles on this topic recently — all published in March 2018 — that I think are worth sharing. Each points to the need for process, technology and critical thinking. The first, Medical staff lacked ‘critical thinking’ in accidental overdose, coroner finds, involves a patient who was given the wrong medication and died from a drug overdose six hours after knee surgery. Hospital staff missed more than 15 opportunities to spot the problem, according to the coroner’s report, which recommended changes to the hospital’s EHR to strengthen patient verification methods and modifications to hospital procedures for administering medication.
Grappling with the evolving guidelines and regulations surrounding opioid prescribing is a significant challenge for health systems across the country. Over-prescription of opioids, such as morphine, oxycodone and hydrocodone, happens in a variety of ways, according to a report authored by a panel of clinical executives at a leading U.S. health system and described in an article in the Sept. 8, 2017 issue of Health Affairs. As the article states, overtreatment and opioid misuse has “driven an epidemic of opioid addiction and drug overdoses, now the leading cause of accidental death in the United States.”
Improving appropriate utilization is a priority for every health system – and it’s the focus of this post, which is Part 4 in a series focused on how high-performing healthcare systems are using clinical process improvement to tackle the common priorities in healthcare often referred to as the “triple aim + 1” or the “quadruple aim.” Part 1 took a high-level look at increasing clinician engagement, delivering quality patient care and containing costs. Part 2 targeted clinician engagement and satisfaction. Part 3 delved deeper into solutions for improving patient safety and quality of care delivery. This piece wraps up the series by focusing on how healthcare systems are effectively reducing costs through appropriate utilization.
Welcome to part 3 of a blog series focused on how high-performing healthcare systems are using clinical process improvement to tackle the common priorities often referred to as the “triple aim + 1” or the “quadruple aim.” The first blog in this series took a high-level look at increasing clinician engagement, delivering quality patient care and containing costs. The second blog focused on clinician engagement and satisfaction. This piece dives deeper into solutions for improving patient quality & safety of care delivery.
A couple weeks ago, I shared insights about addressing common priorities in healthcare, often referred to as the “triple aim + 1” or the “quadruple aim.” Meeting those four objectives – improving patient satisfaction, delivering quality patient care, containing costs and increasing clinician engagement – can be challenging without the proper insight and processes in place.
You may know of it as the “Triple Aim Plus One.” It’s a shortcut reference to four key objectives pursued across healthcare today:
- Improve patient satisfaction
- Deliver quality patient care
- Contain costs
- Increase clinician engagement